India alleges Xiaomi for lying to Deutsche Bank for years about unauthorized royalties payments

More From Author

See more articles

UPDATED: Top 10 Best Telegram Bots that You Must...

You can include tiny, automated computer programs called "Telegram bots" in your channels or chats on the...

Galaxy Tab S9 FE vs OnePlus Pad: Detailed Comparison

Galaxy Tab S9 FE vs OnePlus Pad: Which one is better in 2024? Both of these tablets are...

New JioSaavn Pro Recharge Plans 2024 with Enhanced Benefits...

Jio has unveiled five new JioSaavn Pro recharge plans, offering users a bundled subscription to JioSaavn Pro...

Indian authorities believe that the India division of Chinese smartphone manufacturer Xiaomi Corp. deceived its lender Deutsche Bank AG for years by asserting that it had a royalty payment agreement when, in fact, it did not, according to court records.

Xiaomi’s illegal unauthorized payment details

Since it blocked $670 million of the company’s bank assets after finding that the smartphone vendor sent “illegal payments” to Qualcomm and other parties under the “guise” of royalties, mi and India’s financial crime-fighting agency, the Enforcement Directorate, have been at odds.

Xiaomi

Xiaomi, which denies wrongdoing, filed a court petition in India claiming that the payments were legal and that the asset freeze, which was later upheld by an appeals authority, had “essentially halted” its operations in a crucial market.

The matter will be heard again on November 7 after the court in October declined to grant any relief.

The information in Xiaomi’s Oct. 3 court statement sheds new light on the investigation’s conclusions and demonstrates that federal agents suspected anomalies in the manner the India unit sent money to Qualcomm as royalties for licensed technologies like patents.

According to the documents, mi India informed Deutsche that it would not disclose the agreement with the bank for security concerns.

Even though Qualcomm and Xiaomi India’s CFO Sameer B. S. Rao and managing director Manu Kumar Jain at the time acknowledged that no agreement existed,

According to the Xiaomi investigation, the company said Rao and Jain were threatened with “physical assault” while being questioned by the Indian agency, according to Reuters.

Source

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

━ Related News

Featured

━ Latest News

Featured