Apple AR Headset appears in new amazing benchmarks however, its FAKE

More From Author

See more articles

India CEOs Dominating Global Companies: From Microsoft to Chanel...

India-origin executives are redefining global leadership, with 226 leaders of Indian origin now heading the world's most...

Full Form IT in 2025: What are the best...

Full Form IT: The Best Guide IT stands for information technology in its entire form. Computers are utilised...

Full Form of ITI: What does it mean in...

Full Form of ITI: Here's everything to know about ITI Full Form of ITI: ITI is an abbreviation...

Apple had been speculated to employ the M2 in its first AR headset, therefore the latest benchmark leak, suggesting that the SoC that would be running in the next product is dubbed X1, surprised us. Instead of an 8-core CPU, the listing shows a 12-core component with higher performance than the M2 Max.

The AR headset receives a score of 141585 on Geekbench 6, and assuming that the listing itself did not highlight the warning in’red’ stating that ‘This result has been flagged as inaccurate,’ anyone looking at these numbers would have assumed that Apple will preview a breakthrough product in a few days. For contrast, the figures you’re viewing today are better than what the M2 Max got in the same benchmark, which was 131302.

Apple
credit: wccftech

However, the 12-core Apple X1 would not be a good choice for the AR headset because it will have a large power demand and maybe unmanageable temperatures due to its high power consumption.

The external battery pack that will power Apple’s head-mounted wearable, rumoured to be dubbed Reality Pro, can only be charged for two hours at a time.

To maximise the headset’s runtime, a chipset like the M2 with an 8-core CPU would be a better choice. Furthermore, a prior leak regarding Apple’s Bill of Materials for the AR headset revealed that one of the chips running in the device would be the M2, thus this leak is definitely phoney unless the technology giant was quietly building on a ‘X1’ without any prying eyes following its every step. So obviously this benchmark is a FAKE!

Also Read:

Source

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

━ Related News

Featured

━ Latest News

Featured