Apple AR Headset appears in new amazing benchmarks however, its FAKE

More From Author

See more articles

Myntra Upcoming Sales 2025: Your Fashion Calendar for Maximum...

Myntra Upcoming Sales 2025 In the ever-evolving world of fashion e-commerce, Myntra continues to be India's go-to destination...

Gmail How to Log Out in 2025: Android, iPhone,...

Gmail how to log out: A Gmail account is required these days to utilise the Google Play...

Dimensity 6020 vs Snapdragon 695: Mid-Range Chipset Battle

Dimensity 6020 vs Snapdragon 695: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (SD695) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC found...

Apple had been speculated to employ the M2 in its first AR headset, therefore the latest benchmark leak, suggesting that the SoC that would be running in the next product is dubbed X1, surprised us. Instead of an 8-core CPU, the listing shows a 12-core component with higher performance than the M2 Max.

The AR headset receives a score of 141585 on Geekbench 6, and assuming that the listing itself did not highlight the warning in’red’ stating that ‘This result has been flagged as inaccurate,’ anyone looking at these numbers would have assumed that Apple will preview a breakthrough product in a few days. For contrast, the figures you’re viewing today are better than what the M2 Max got in the same benchmark, which was 131302.

Apple
credit: wccftech

However, the 12-core Apple X1 would not be a good choice for the AR headset because it will have a large power demand and maybe unmanageable temperatures due to its high power consumption.

The external battery pack that will power Apple’s head-mounted wearable, rumoured to be dubbed Reality Pro, can only be charged for two hours at a time.

To maximise the headset’s runtime, a chipset like the M2 with an 8-core CPU would be a better choice. Furthermore, a prior leak regarding Apple’s Bill of Materials for the AR headset revealed that one of the chips running in the device would be the M2, thus this leak is definitely phoney unless the technology giant was quietly building on a ‘X1’ without any prying eyes following its every step. So obviously this benchmark is a FAKE!

Also Read:

Source

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

━ Related News

Featured

━ Latest News

Featured