Newest season has ripoffs: Fortnite 2026

Fortnite’s newest season has ripoffs of two iconic Nintendo characters in its fresh cosmetic lineup, and the controversy matters because it tests how far Epic Games can push cross-franchise design before players start calling it “too close.” On August 17, 2026, coverage surfaced that Fortnite introduced skins resembling Mario and Link, as discussed in reports published the day before by TheGamer, and Epic Games continues to be the studio responsible for the battle royale phenomenon. Here’s the thing: the skins are not just a cosmetic question; they shape how trust works in every partnership-style event.
We’ve seen Fortnite pull in dozens of franchises over the years, but the current debate centers on Nintendo-adjacent character silhouettes. When a cosmetic looks like an instantly recognizable icon, even fans who love crossovers start asking where homage ends and copying begins. And if Nintendo doesn’t like what it sees, it’s not just aesthetics that could be at stake; it’s future collaboration momentum.

Newest season has ripoffs: Overview: What’s happening in Fortnite right now

Epic Games developed and published Fortnite, and the latest “crossover-heavy” season has become a flashpoint for Nintendo character references. According to TheGamer, players spotted hidden references tied to two specific Nintendo icons, Mario and Link, within the newest event cosmetics. As of August 17, 2026, those observations have circulated widely, and the question now is whether the resemblance is intentional branding or an avoidable misstep.
Worth noting: the issue is less about Nintendo content being present at all and more about how closely the cosmetics mirror well-known character designs. That distinction matters because battle royale cosmetics are monetized at scale, and small visual differences can still be perceived as deliberate replication. In short, the conflict is a design ethics test happening inside a live service.

Verdict: The core controversy is visual resemblance to Mario and Link, not the existence of crossovers.

Key Details: The Mario and Link resemblance claims

Players are pointing to two event cosmetics that look “ridiculously close” to Link and to another skin resembling Mario, as highlighted in coverage by TheGamer on August 16, 2026. The same report frames this as part of a broader wave of high-volume additions that Fortnite is using to keep the roster feeling fresh.
Here’s the thing: even if Epic Games designed these as original characters, players react to silhouette, color blocking, and signature accessories. Link-inspired looks are often recognizable from the hat shape, tunic palette, and overall proportions, while Mario-like looks typically trigger quick comparisons through hat-and-overalls styling cues. If those details are near-1:1, the community’s fastest instinct is to treat them as ripoffs, not tributes.

Root cause: why these skins ignite immediate backlash

The root cause is design pressure inside live service events. Fortnite has to ship constant new cosmetics, and franchise-friendly aesthetics are a low-friction way to get instant recognition. That recognition is a marketing win, but it also removes the “interpretation gap” for players who view cosmetics as derivative.
That said, the legal and brand-risk calculus is tricky. High similarity can create platform-level and partner-level tension, even when the game is trying to deliver “fan service” energy. In a game where skins are the social identity layer, the resemblance debate becomes personal, not just technical.

Context: The trade-offs behind the available fixes

Now we reach the problem-solution fork because Epic and the community have a few paths forward. Each option has a downside, and the best choice depends on whether the goal is to reduce player outrage, reduce legal exposure, or preserve event momentum.

Candidate solution	What it does	Downside
Rename and adjust the cosmetics’ visual details	Reduce Mario and Link likeness by changing silhouettes, colors, and signature accessories	It can upset players who bought the look they expected
Keep them but add clearer “inspired-by” framing	Tries to position designs as references, not copies	Framing alone may not satisfy partners or reduce resemblance claims
Remove or delay the cosmetics in future rotations	Stops the controversy at the source for upcoming updates	It risks backlash for taking content away mid-event

Here’s the thing: removing content is the most direct risk reduction, but it also breaks the live service rhythm. Adjusting visuals is usually the middle ground, yet it can still trigger “bait-and-switch” accusations.

Clear framing is the least disruptive, but if players see near-identical design cues, language may not fix the perception. Stay tuned for more on newest season has ripoffs of two iconic nintendo characters. For wider coverage, see TechCrunch.

What’s Next: Our recommendation for Epic Games and Fortnite Chapter Season

If the priority is to protect Fortnite’s long-term cross-franchise ecosystem, Epic should revise the visuals to lower direct similarity while preserving the spirit of each design. That approach reduces the chance that the newest season has ripoffs of two iconic Nintendo characters becomes an ongoing pattern rather than a one-time controversy.
Then, for immediate damage control, Epic should communicate changes before the next Fortnite Chapter Season push so players understand what was altered and why. If Epic chooses “keep as-is,” it risks continued calls of ripoff behavior and partner friction. If it chooses “remove,” it preserves brand safety but costs event value and player goodwill.
In the coming weeks, watch whether new cosmetics replace or modify the Mario- and Link-adjacent items in rotational offers, and whether the event theme shifts away from Nintendo-adjacent silhouettes. If changes arrive, the community will decide whether Fortnite learned the lesson. If it doesn’t, the debate will likely follow every similar design decision.
The next Fortnite update could decide whether trust holds—or whether this controversy becomes the template for how the community reacts to franchise-inspired cosmetics going forward.

FAQs

Are the Mario and Link skins officially confirmed as Nintendo characters in Fortnite?

No official confirmation is described in the available reporting; the current claims are based on visual resemblance called out in coverage by TheGamer, not on an official “Mario” or “Link” label from Epic.

What does “ripoffs” mean in this Fortnite context?

In this discussion, “ripoffs” refers to how closely the cosmetics resemble Mario and Link through recognizable design cues, according to player comparisons surfaced in reporting about the newest season.

Will Fortnite remove or change the cosmetics?

No official removal plan is provided in the cited coverage, so any outcome depends on Epic Games’ response to community and partner risk signals as the Fortnite event cycles forward.

Closing takeaway

Epic Games can keep crossovers exciting, but if Fortnite keeps leaning into near-identical silhouettes, the newest season has ripoffs of two iconic Nintendo characters narrative will keep spreading—until visuals change.

Was this article helpful?

Your feedback directly improves future articles on this site.

Share feedback to improve articles (sends your vote only, no personal data)