The K-pop world is buzzing after a private video allegedly showing KISS OF LIFE’s Julie with VERIVERY members Kangmin and Yeonho surfaced online. What should have remained private has sparked heated debates about idol privacy, with fans fiercely defending the artists and agencies preparing legal action.

The footage, reportedly filmed without consent and leaked from questionable sources, has divided opinions. But here’s what most fans agree on: the idols did nothing wrong.

Julie & VERIVERY Controversy at a Glance

Element	Information
Idols Featured	Julie (KISS OF LIFE), Kangmin & Yeonho (VERIVERY)
Video Duration	4+ hours (timer visible on screen)
Alleged Source	Explicit content website
Viral Date	September 29, 2025
Jellyfish Response	Denied all claims, called it “malicious”
S2 Entertainment Response	Declined comment, citing personal matters
Legal Status	Both agencies pursuing legal action

What Actually Happened?

A lengthy video clip began circulating on social media, allegedly showing the three idols in a private setting. According to fan accounts on X (formerly Twitter), the footage originated from a site hosting explicit content and was misleadingly labeled as “skinship”—a Korean term for affectionate physical contact.

The timer in the video showed it ran for over four hours. Another woman appeared midway through, and the group eventually left together. Fans who viewed the footage insist nothing inappropriate occurred—just normal socializing among friends.

“They didn’t even do anything wrong and there was another woman too,” one X user wrote, adding they’d reported the account spreading the video to S2 Entertainment.

How Agencies Responded

VERIVERY’s Label Takes Strong Stance

Jellyfish Entertainment came out swinging with a firm denial. The agency called the rumors “groundless” and described them as fabricated content designed to harm Kangmin and Yeonho’s reputations.

“Such rumors are not true at all and are malicious false claims that are seriously damaging artists’ reputation,” their statement read. They demanded immediate cessation of video sharing and confirmed plans for aggressive legal action against anyone involved in creating or spreading the content.

Julie’s Agency Stays Neutral

S2 Entertainment took a different approach when contacted by Xports News. They simply stated the matter was related to Julie’s “personal affairs” and declined to elaborate further. This neither-confirm-nor-deny stance has left some interpretation open while respecting potential privacy boundaries.

Fans Rally Behind the Idols

The K-pop community’s response has been overwhelmingly supportive. Social media exploded with defenses:

“Nothing scandalous here”: Multiple fans emphasized the video shows ordinary hanging out, not inappropriate behavior.

Privacy violation outcry: Regardless of content, filming and leaking private moments without consent is illegal and unethical.

Manufactured drama: Many accused gossip accounts of creating controversy from innocent interactions. “Online netizens are making a scandal out of nothing,” several comments noted.

Active reporting: Fans have been reporting accounts spreading the video, supporting the agencies’ legal efforts.

The Privacy Problem in K-Pop

This incident reflects a deeper issue plaguing the Korean entertainment industry—the erosion of idol privacy. From sasaeng stalkers to hidden cameras and leaked footage, K-pop stars face unprecedented invasion into their personal lives.

South Korea has strict laws protecting individuals from such violations. Both agencies have proven track records in defamation cases, suggesting serious legal consequences await those responsible for the leak.

What makes this case particularly concerning is the alleged source—an explicit content platform. This suggests the footage may have been stolen or obtained through illegal means, making distribution even more problematic legally.

Julie’s Rocky 2025

This marks Julie’s second major controversy this year. In April, KISS OF LIFE faced backlash during her 25th birthday livestream when the group adopted hip-hop stereotypes considered cultural appropriation. The fallout was severe:

Lost 200,000+ social media followers
KCON LA 2025 performance cancelled
Public apology issued, livestream deleted

However, this new situation fundamentally differs. The birthday livestream involved the group’s own choices, while this video represents an apparent invasion of privacy beyond their control.

What Happens Next?

Both agencies are moving forward with legal proceedings against those creating, sharing, and reproducing the content. Korean defamation and privacy laws strongly favor celebrities in such cases, with penalties including fines and potential criminal charges.

For fans, the message is clear: support your idols by not engaging with leaked private content, regardless of how innocent it may appear. Sharing such material perpetuates the violation and could make you legally liable.

As one fan eloquently stated: “They didn’t even do anything wrong.” Perhaps that’s the most important takeaway—idols deserve personal lives without becoming fodder for manufactured scandals.

FAQs

Q: Have Julie, Kangmin, or Yeonho confirmed being in the video?

No official confirmation exists. Jellyfish Entertainment explicitly denied the claims about Kangmin and Yeonho, calling them “malicious false claims.” S2 Entertainment declined to comment on Julie’s involvement, citing personal privacy. None of the idols have personally addressed the situation publicly.

Q: Is it illegal to share the video on social media?

Yes, potentially. Sharing private footage obtained without consent violates South Korean privacy laws. Both agencies announced legal action against those distributing the content. Fans sharing the video could face legal consequences including defamation charges, fines, or criminal prosecution depending on jurisdiction and circumstances.