BAN13/1 (7.2 ov)
WI356
AFG
ZIM407/6 (106 ov)
GOA
Bengaluru
Hamburg
Gladbach
Venezia
Udinese
Toulouse
Strasbourg
Everton
Coventry
Sevilla
Alavés
NZ
IND
Inter Kashi
SC Delhi
AZ1
JUV2
B040
OLM1
SLB3
LECH1
CEL1
USG2
UGA-W
NAM-W
KAY
SPR95/3 (11.5/20 ov)
TUSK
RHINO
MOUNT11/1 (3/50 ov)
ROCKS
DMJIR290 & 134/5 (46 ov) (f/o)
HYD-R519/8d
KRBLS280 & 2/1 (2 ov)
SRB241 & 388/5d
FSLB259 & 54/1 (26 ov) (f/o)
PRB503/4d
LAHW234 & 40/4 (17 ov, target 412)
FATA362 & 283
ISB215 & 163/6 (51 ov)
MUL327
PCBXI151/8d
SL223/7d & 121/6 (38 ov)
WI-A
LIONS
MS-W
SS-W
MR-W
AS-W
BH-W
HH-W
CHR
POA
RWA-W
USA-W
EASTN
DOLPH
ST-W166 (19/20 ov, target 184)
PS-W183/3
WAR138/7 (20 ov)
BOL138/5
BIK83
KAG86/1 (9.4/20 ov, target 84)
JAB133/8 (20 ov, target 150)
LUL149/8
MAL1988
SL1991/1 (13.5/50 ov, target 89)
Leeds
Spurs
CEL3
BES2
HBE0
OFI2
Just when fans thought actor Jo Byeong-kyu’s long-running school bullying controversy had reached its final chapter, the story is heading back to court. The Seoul High Court has now set a date for the first appellate hearing, reopening a case that’s already spanned five years, two courts, and a complete reversal of public sentiment.
Jo Byeong-kyuQuick Recap of the Case
| Stage | What Happened |
|---|---|
| Feb 2021 | An individual identified only as “A” publicly accused Jo of school bullying during his time in New Zealand |
| Jul 2021 | Police investigations concluded the claims were fabricated; A reportedly apologized |
| Later | Jo sued A for damages exceeding 4 billion KRW, citing lost contracts and career setbacks |
| Sep 2025 | Seoul Central District Court dismissed Jo’s lawsuit, citing insufficient evidence |
| Jun 2026 | Seoul High Court schedules the appeal’s first hearing for August 28 |
Why the Lower Court Ruled Against Him
This is the twist that confused a lot of fans: police had earlier called the bullying claims fabricated, yet the civil court still sided against Jo. The judge found that Jo’s side hadn’t proven the accuser lied, partly because his supporting witnesses were close friends from his New Zealand days and were viewed as biased. The court also ordered Jo to cover legal costs for both parties.
What Changes in the Appeal
The appeal isn’t a simple repeat of round one. Jo’s team has significantly lowered the damages claim, from over 4 billion KRW down to roughly 900 million KRW. His former agency, HB Entertainment, has also reportedly been removed as a co-appellant, meaning this round centers solely on Jo himself.
What’s at Stake
If the appeal succeeds, it could meaningfully restore Jo’s public standing after a rocky few years that included career setbacks and an extended hiatus. If it fails again, the case effectively confirms the original court’s reasoning and could close the door on further legal recourse. Either way, August 28 is shaping up to be a pivotal date for the actor’s career.
For more breakdowns of ongoing K-drama and K-pop industry stories, check out TechnoSports for continuing coverage. For background on Jo Byeong-kyu’s career and filmography, see his profile on Wikipedia.
