ISL 2025-26 Format Debate: Did Clubs Miss Opportunity with Conference Model?

The Indian Super League rejected a conference model proposed by the AIFF committee in December 2025, instead opting for a traditional single home-and-away league format. The decision raises questions about whether clubs prioritized short-term revenue over long-term operational efficiency during the compressed February-May 2026 season. AIFF’s three-man committee had proposed two formats: a conference model with two seven-team groups or a single-leg home-and-away tournament. The clubs voted overwhelmingly for the home-and-away format, citing financial considerations. However, financial analysts suggest the decision may have prioritized certain franchises’ immediate revenue needs over broader ecosystem sustainability.

Format Comparison and Key Differences

Both formats guarantee each club 11-13 group-stage matches, yet the AIFF proposal’s conference structure would have reduced logistical complexity significantly. The eventual single-leg format requires all 14 clubs maintaining constant availability for travel, while the conference model would have concentrated fixtures within regional groupings, reducing overall movement and operational complexity.

Why Clubs Rejected the Conference Model

Certain franchises—notably East Bengal, Mohun Bagan, Kerala Blasters, Jamshedpur, Bengaluru, Goa, and Northeast United—command significant home attendance, often exceeding 10,000 supporters. These clubs generate substantial matchday revenue through tickets, hospitality, and merchandise. The conference model, concentrating teams geographically, would have eliminated these high-revenue home fixtures for many weeks, directly impacting financial projections already strained by the commercial partner absence.

Financial and Operational Arguments for Conference Model

The conference format would have substantially reduced operational expenses. Stadium maintenance costs, traditionally borne individually, would have been distributed across multiple clubs. Travel expenses—including flights, accommodation, and per diem—would have decreased dramatically with concentrated fixtures. Broadcasting from centralized venues would have streamlined production, potentially reducing costs for Prime Video.

Additionally, the tight schedule (February 14 to May 17) creates minimal recovery windows between matches. Players experiencing 72-84 hour turnarounds between competitive matches face elevated injury risk. Conference clustering would have extended recovery periods, potentially reducing injury incidence and improving player welfare during the compressed campaign.

Clubs Facing Financial Pressure

Mohammedan SC and Inter Kashi explicitly requested permission to play all fixtures away from home, acknowledging their inability to generate sufficient home-game revenue. These clubs recognize that maintaining home venues represents a financial burden they cannot sustainably support. Smaller franchises without established fan bases would have benefited significantly from conference concentration, avoiding expensive stadium operations.

Relegation Dynamics and Competitive Fairness

The conference model would have created meaningful relegation battles within group structures. Bottom-three clubs within each group competing for survival would have avoided playing elite teams while mathematically eliminated. This structure would have preserved dignity and competitiveness during relegation scraps, contrasting with the current format where bottom-placed teams continue facing championship contenders throughout May.

Current format dynamics create inequitable situations where already-relegated teams face remaining championship contenders, impacting competitive integrity and player morale. Conference grouping would have ensured relegated teams retain hope until mathematical elimination, improving overall league quality and competitive balance.

Season Logistics and Schedule Intensity

The single-leg format concentrates 91 matches across 103 days (February 14 to May 17), with double-headers on weekends and single matches Thursday. This intensity creates minimal recovery time, increased travel frequency, and elevated injury risk. Conference concentration would have enabled more balanced scheduling with superior player recovery protocols and reduced logistical chaos.

Expert Assessment and Moving Forward

The format decision reflects clubs prioritizing immediate revenue over systemic sustainability. While certain franchises benefit enormously from home fixtures, the league’s overall health suffers from increased operational costs, compressed schedules, and elevated injury risk.

Future ISL seasons might reconsider conference models when operational stability becomes more critical than individual franchise revenue maximization.

Read More: Adama Traoré to West Ham: Nuno Reunites with Spanish Winger in Relegation Fight

FAQs