15 Premier League footballers were found with banned substances but no one was fined

More From Author

See more articles

Best XI with the most Champions League titles in...

The Champions League, or European Cup as it was previously called, is the most prestigious trophy in...

Jassim Bin Hamad Al Thani net worth: How much...

Qatari Sheikh Jassim Bin Hamad Al Thani, the chairman of the Qatar Islamic Bank, has placed a...

Top 10 best defenders of all-time – Maldini, Ramos,...

A good defence is the key to winning titles in football. And over the years, we have...

According to the Mail, 15 Premier League footballers between 2015 and 2020 tested positive for banned substances. But, not one of them was disqualified from the competition. The UKAD usually does not ban competitors if the substance was accidentally ingested, or if the player has a Therapeutic Use Exemption. 

Twelve players tested positive for performance-enhancing substances that were banned in the country. In total, 88 footballers from Wales, Scotland and England failed a variety of drug tests between 2013 and 2020, with adverse findings. 

Premier League’s failed drug tests lead to no bans 

The twelve cases of performance-enhancing drugs included one positive test for amphetamine and three findings of triamcinolone, the corticosteroid that Sir Bradley Wiggins used to treat hay fever before his Tour de France victory. 

Four cases for Ritalin and one for the testosterone-boosting hormone, Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) were found. HCG is often used in cycling and mixed martial arts. 

The remainder of the positive tests were for steroids prednisolone and diuretic indapamide, which can help mask the presence of other drugs in an athlete’s system. Athletes need to undergo medical tests following the detection to rule out the case of medical conditions for the reason behind their drug use. 

The UKAD refused to reveal the details of the  Premier League players that were found with these substances in their bloodstreams. One of the reasons was due to the protection of minors, while the major one was that the FA didn’t ban certain substances that FIFA had ruled out categorically. 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

━ Related News

Featured

━ Latest News

Featured