Fresh from his Oscar-winning performance in Oppenheimer, Cillian Murphy returns to Netflix with “Steve,” a visceral drama that strips away glamour to expose the raw reality of mental health struggles and educational reform. Based on Max Porter’s acclaimed novella “Shy,” this mid-90s set character study proves Murphy’s range extends far beyond blockbuster biopics into deeply human territory.
Table of Contents
Steve at a Glance
| Element | Details |
|---|---|
| Release Date | October 3, 2025 (Netflix) |
| Director | Tim Mielants |
| Based On | “Shy” by Max Porter |
| Lead Actor | Cillian Murphy |
| Supporting Cast | Jay Lycurgo, Emily Watson, Tracey Ullman |
| Runtime | Drama |
| Rotten Tomatoes | 77% (48 reviews) |
| IMDb Rating | 7.2/10 |
| Setting | Mid-1990s reform school |
What Steve Is About
Steve follows a headteacher battling for his reform school’s survival while managing his mental health, alongside troubled student Shy who navigates his violent tendencies and fragility, torn between his past and future prospects. Set at Stanton Woods, a reform school for troubled teenagers, the film examines whether such institutions deserve support or if society has abandoned the youth they serve.
Murphy embodies Steve, a headteacher fighting on two fronts: saving his school from closure and preventing his own psychological collapse. The dual narrative structure weaves Steve’s institutional battles with Shy’s personal struggles, creating a tapestry of compassion, despair, and fragile hope.
Cillian Murphy’s Career-Defining Performance
Post-Oppenheimer, Murphy could have chosen any blockbuster project. Instead, he selected an intimate character study that demands emotional vulnerability without theatrical flourish. His portrayal of Steve reveals a man fracturing under the weight of caring too much in a system that cares too little.
Though Cillian Murphy takes top billing and turns in a visceral effort in the title role, this is really a formidable ensemble effort as he leads a small group of teachers in what seems to be a constant rearguard action with some of the most unruly teenagers you’ll ever see.
Murphy’s Steve isn’t a heroic savior figure. He’s exhausted, anxious, and teetering on the edge—making him achingly real. Similar to his complex portrayal in Peaky Blinders, Murphy finds humanity in broken men.
A Story That Mirrors Reality
Based on Max Porter’s acclaimed novel “Shy,” the story takes place in the mid-90s and follows Steve, a headteacher at a reform school for troubled teenagers. Porter’s novella gained critical acclaim for its empathetic examination of youth services in crisis, and director Tim Mielants translates that sensitivity to screen without sanitizing the harsh realities.
The 1990s setting isn’t coincidental. This era marked significant shifts in educational policy regarding troubled youth, with many reform schools facing closure due to funding cuts and philosophical debates about punishment versus rehabilitation—issues still painfully relevant today.
The Supporting Ensemble Shines
Jay Lycurgo’s portrayal of Shy provides the emotional counterweight to Murphy’s crumbling authority figure. Shy embodies the contradictions these institutions face: a young person capable of violence yet deserving compassion, someone society labels “troubled” while offering inadequate support.
Emily Watson and Tracey Ullman round out the teaching staff, each character representing different coping mechanisms for working in impossible circumstances. The constant struggles and little victories create a rhythm that feels authentic to anyone who’s worked in underfunded social services.
Critical Reception and Impact
On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, 77% of 48 critics’ reviews are positive. Critics praise the film’s refusal to offer easy answers or melodramatic resolutions. This isn’t a “inspirational teacher saves troubled kids” narrative—it’s far more honest and, consequently, more devastating.
Netflix’s Steve premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival before its theatrical and streaming release, generating conversation about mental health in caregiving professions—a topic cinema rarely explores with such nuance.
Why Steve Matters Now
In an era where teacher burnout, youth mental health crises, and institutional failures dominate headlines, “Steve” arrives as uncomfortably timely. The film doesn’t romanticize sacrifice; it questions how much we ask individuals to sacrifice for broken systems.
“You always gotta use compassion to try and make a difference” captures the film’s philosophy—compassion as active resistance against systemic indifference, even when it costs everything.
For viewers who appreciated the emotional depth of Mental Health in Cinema, “Steve” represents a mature evolution in how media portrays psychological struggle without exploitation or simplification.
Final Verdict
“Steve” isn’t an easy watch, nor should it be. Murphy delivers a performance stripped of vanity, supported by an ensemble that understands subtlety. Director Tim Mielants crafts a film that trusts audiences to sit with discomfort rather than rush toward catharsis.
This is essential viewing for anyone interested in honest portrayals of mental health, the education system’s failures, and the human cost of institutional neglect. Murphy continues proving he’s one of cinema’s most fearless actors, choosing artistic challenge over commercial safety.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Is Steve based on a true story?
A: Steve is based on Max Porter’s 2023 novella “Shy,” which draws inspiration from real experiences within the UK’s reform school system during the 1990s. While not depicting specific individuals, the story authentically reflects the challenges faced by educators and students in underfunded institutions for troubled youth. The film captures the systemic issues, funding crises, and philosophical debates surrounding reform schools that were particularly intense during that era and remain relevant today.
Q: What makes Cillian Murphy’s performance in Steve different from his role in Oppenheimer?
A: While Oppenheimer showcased Murphy’s ability to portray intellectual complexity and historical weight, Steve reveals raw emotional vulnerability and psychological fragility. As Steve, Murphy plays a contemporary everyman rather than a historical figure, focusing on internal collapse rather than external achievement. The performance requires sustained emotional exposure without the theatrical elements of a period biopic, demonstrating Murphy’s range from blockbuster leading man to intimate character study. It’s arguably his most personally devastating performance, showing a man unraveling in real-time without heroic redemption.
