Indian football’s premier competition, the Indian Super League (ISL), is facing an unprecedented crisis. With the existing Master Rights Agreement (MRA) between the Football Sports Development Limited (FSDL) and the All India Football Federation (AIFF) set to expire in December 2025, the upcoming season’s commencement hangs in the balance. Several ISL clubs have been privately informed that unless the MRA impasse is resolved, the next edition of the competition may not take place. As India’s football ecosystem stands at this crucial juncture, uncertainty clouds the future of the nation’s most high-profile sporting league.
Table of Contents
MRA Expiry Sparks League-Wide Anxiety
The core of the unfolding crisis stems from the expiring 15-year MRA, signed in 2010, which handed FSDL—the commercial arm of Reliance and Star—the exclusive rights to manage and operate the Indian Super League. Under the agreement, FSDL has been paying the AIFF an annual sum of ₹50 crore or 20% of total revenue, whichever is higher. This landmark deal not only elevated Indian club football commercially but also established Indian Super League as the country’s primary football league.
However, with the agreement nearing its conclusion and critical decisions pending, Indian Super League’s very foundation appears increasingly unstable. “Since last week, senior FSDL officials have met club owners individually and they have been told that ISL won’t kick off, unless the future of the MRA is clear,” a source revealed to TOI. “Everyone knows that the MRA cannot be finalised overnight. Moreover, with Supreme Court expected to finalise the new (AIFF) Constitution, everyone is on tenterhooks.”
Operational Freeze Forces Clubs to Pause Preparations
This deadlock has triggered a ripple effect across Indian Super League outfits. Club strategies have been put on hold, major transfer plans are in limbo, and preseason preparations have been delayed. Although AIFF had tentatively earmarked September 14 as the kick-off for the 2025-26 season, that date is now surrounded by doubt.
Additionally, there are concerns that Indian Super League clubs may struggle to field competitive teams in the upcoming Durand Cup. With India’s oldest football competition scheduled from July 23 to August 23, at least two clubs have already expressed their reservations about participation. The uncertainty, stemming entirely from the unresolved MRA, is threatening to derail the build-up to what should otherwise be a vibrant domestic football season.
Proposed New Structure: A Holding Company Model
In an attempt to find a middle ground, FSDL has proposed a significant shift in the governance model for Indian football. Moving away from the earlier financial arrangement, FSDL has suggested forming a new holding company to oversee the ISL. According to this proposal, ISL clubs would hold a 60% stake, FSDL would control 26%, and AIFF would retain a minority 14%.
“FSDL reached out to AIFF early this year and had set timelines, according to which the signing of the term sheet was to be completed by April 30,” a source stated. Yet, instead of progressing with negotiations, the AIFF opted to form an eight-member task force to examine the proposal, a decision that further complicated matters. Former national captain Bhaichung Bhutia publicly urged the executive committee to defer the decision until the Supreme Court concluded its review of the AIFF Constitution.
Supreme Court Verdict to Shape Indian Football’s Future
The Supreme Court has since intervened, instructing the AIFF not to take any major decisions regarding the MRA until after the constitution’s approval. The hearing and subsequent verdict are now expected once the Court resumes full operations from July 14.
This legal uncertainty casts a long shadow over the ISL. According to the draft AIFF constitution, “India’s top league should be managed by the AIFF. The draft also states that the seniormost league should be owned, operated and directly managed by AIFF. Its roles cannot be assigned to any other entity or organisation,” one official confirmed.
Should this draft pass, it would fundamentally alter the governance model that Indian football has followed over the past decade.
Mixed Reactions Among Clubs Amid Growing Concern
ISL stakeholders remain divided over the league’s future trajectory. While some officials believe FSDL might request a temporary six-month extension to navigate the immediate crisis, others worry about deeper institutional instability. “Everything will depend on the Supreme Court order,” noted a club CEO. “Once the AIFF Constitution is finalised, we have to check the status of the top-tier league.“
“There is also a possibility of elections happening in the next few months, so a lot can change. As clubs, an important stakeholder, it’s important that we get at least a year to handle the unexpected changes.”
Legacy at Stake
Since its inaugural season in 2014, the ISL has steadily grown into Indian football’s flagship competition. Gaining recognition as the nation’s official top-tier league by FIFA and AFC in 2019 was a defining milestone. However, as the countdown begins towards December’s MRA expiry, what lies ahead could determine whether that progress continues—or comes to a sudden halt.
With multiple moving pieces, including potential elections, court orders, and commercial negotiations, Indian football is on the cusp of a historic turning point.
Read More: Can Inter Kashi Still Clinch the I-League Title? CAS Verdict Offers New Hope Amid Controversy
FAQs
Why is the next ISL season under threat?
The ISL’s future is uncertain due to delays in renewing the Master Rights Agreement (MRA) between FSDL and AIFF.
When does the current agreement end?
The existing MRA expires in December 2025.
What solution has FSDL proposed?
FSDL has suggested a new holding company with clubs (60%), FSDL (26%), and AIFF (14%) as stakeholders.
How are clubs reacting to the situation?
Many clubs have paused signings, delayed pre-season, and may skip the upcoming Durand Cup.
When will there be clarity on ISL’s future?
Clarity is expected after the Supreme Court’s decision on AIFF’s draft constitution, likely post July 14.
