# BTS V Speaks Out — His Private Chat With Min Hee Jin Was Used in Court Without His Permission

URL: https://technosports.co.in/bts-v-speaks-out-his-private-chat-with-min/  
Published: 2026-02-20  
Updated: 2026-02-20  
Author: Reetam Bodhak

This is one of those situations where a celebrity is dragged into a controversy they had absolutely no intention of being part of — and V’s response makes it very clear he is not okay with it.

The ongoing legal war between former ADOR CEO **Min Hee Jin** and HYBE — centred around the similarities debate between [NewJeans](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NewJeans) and ILLIT — took a surprising new turn when a private KakaoTalk conversation between **BTS’s V** and Min Hee Jin was submitted as court evidence. Without his knowledge. Without his consent.

## BTS V x Min Hee Jin Chat Controversy — Key Facts

![](https://technosports.co.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/image-1283-1024x576.png)

| Detail | Info |
| --- | --- |
| **BTS Member Involved** | V (Kim Taehyung) |
| **Former CEO** | Min Hee Jin (ex-CEO, ADOR) |
| **Chat Platform** | KakaoTalk (private message) |
| **Used As** | Legal evidence in HYBE vs Min Hee Jin case |
| **V’s Consent Taken?** | No — submitted without his knowledge |
| **V’s Response** | Instagram Story (Feb 20, 2026) |
| **Legal Dispute** | NewJeans vs ILLIT similarities lawsuit |
| **BTS Upcoming Album** | ARIRANG — releasing March 20, 2026 |

## What Did V Actually Say in the Chat?

The KakaoTalk message that found its way into the courtroom reportedly had V acknowledging that he, too, noticed similarities between NewJeans and ILLIT. The text read that he had taken a look and thought the groups seemed somewhat alike — a candid, casual observation shared between acquaintances in a private conversation.

It’s the kind of thing anyone might say to a friend in passing. The problem? That “passing comment” is now part of a high-profile legal case.

## V Draws a Clear Line on Instagram

Rather than letting his agency handle the statement, V took the matter into his own hands. On his Instagram Story, he was direct and composed — clarifying that the conversation was a personal, empathetic exchange shared with someone he knew, and that he had no intention of taking sides in the dispute.

His core message was unambiguous: the chat was submitted to court **without his consent**, and he found it deeply upsetting that a private moment was weaponised for legal proceedings he was never meant to be involved in.

It’s a completely fair and measured response — V isn’t throwing anyone under the bus, but he’s also not letting his privacy be violated without saying something about it.

For all the latest [BTS news, album updates, and K-pop controversy coverage](https://technosports.co.in) and our full breakdown of the [HYBE vs Min Hee Jin legal saga explained simply](https://technosports.co.in), stay updated at Technosports.

## FAQs

### **Q: Why is BTS V involved in the Min Hee Jin vs HYBE lawsuit?**

A private KakaoTalk conversation between V and Min Hee Jin — in which V casually mentioned noticing similarities between NewJeans and ILLIT — was submitted as court evidence without his knowledge or consent.

### **Q: What did BTS V say about the use of his private chat in court?**

V posted on Instagram clarifying it was a personal conversation shared with empathy, stating he had no intention of taking sides and was upset that his private chat was submitted as evidence without his permission.