AMD EPYC 9754 “Bergamo” CPU is shown to be 42% faster then Intel’s Sapphire Rapids

More From Author

See more articles

India CEOs Dominating Global Companies: From Microsoft to Chanel...

India-origin executives are redefining global leadership, with 226 leaders of Indian origin now heading the world's most...

Full Form IT in 2025: What are the best...

Full Form IT: The Best Guide IT stands for information technology in its entire form. Computers are utilised...

Full Form of ITI: What does it mean in...

Full Form of ITI: Here's everything to know about ITI Full Form of ITI: ITI is an abbreviation...

The V-Ray benchmark has published the first public benchmarks of AMD EPYC 9754 “Bergamo” CPU with the new Zen 4C cores. AMD has officially released their EPYC Bergamo CPUs, which include a brand-new Zen 4C CPU core. This new core enables AMD to offer up to two times the core density of regular Genoa chips, allowing for up to 128 cores and 256 threads.

At the same time, AMD maintains practically all architectural choices while expanding its efficiency edge over the competitors. The first independent benchmarks of the AMD EPYC 9754 “Bergamo” CPU, which is also the flagship component, are now available.

AMD EPYC 9754
credit: wccftech

In a 360W TDP package, AMD EPYC 9754 has 128 cores, 256 threads, 256 MB L3 cache, and boost frequencies of up to 3.10 GHz. The CPU was compared in both 1P and 2P setups, with the following findings.

The AMD EPYC 9754 “Bergamo” CPU alone was able to outperform two AMD EPYC 9554 64-core Genoa CPUs by 3.2%. The Genoa CPUs have a substantially higher boost clock of 3.75 GHz, which is 21% higher than the Bergamo CPUs.

AMD EPYC 9754
credit: wccftech

The CPU also outperformed the EPYC 9654, Genoa’s flagship chip, by 41%, despite having a higher boost frequency of 3.7 GHz. The CPU also outperformed a twin Intel Xeon Platinum 8490H systems by 42%. Even when compared to the current fastest Threadripper Pro CPU, the 5995WX in a 2-way configuration, the EPYC Bergamo dual-socket solution outperformed it by 2.42x.

Also Read:

Source

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

━ Related News

Featured

━ Latest News

Featured