This aircraft has had issues for YEARS: ex Air India Crew

On June 12, 2025, what began as a standard international departure from Ahmedabad turned into one of India’s deadliest aviation disasters. Air India Flight AI171, a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner en route to London Gatwick, crashed just moments after takeoff, killing 241 of the 242 people on board. With only one survivor and haunting questions about the aircraft’s history, this incident has shaken the aviation industry and cast a harsh spotlight on Air India’s safety practices and corporate accountability.

This blog provides a comprehensive breakdown of the crash—detailing flight data, survivor testimony, aircraft history, expert analysis, and disturbing whistleblower revelations that suggest the tragedy may have been preventable. As investigations unfold, the story of AI171 serves as a painful reminder of the cost of systemic negligence and the urgent need for reform in aviation oversight.

Tragic Boeing 787 Dreamliner Incident in Ahmedabad

Date: June 12, 2025
Aircraft: Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner (Registration: VT-ANB)
Flight: AI171 (Ahmedabad to London Gatwick)
Casualties: 241 confirmed fatalities, 1 survivor

Incident Overview

On June 12, 2025, Air India Flight AI171, a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, crashed shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad airport at approximately 13:38 hours local time. The aircraft was en route to London Gatwick with 242 people on board, including passengers and crew members.

Key Facts:

• Aircraft age: 11 years (delivered to Air India in February 2014)
• Flight path: Domestic positioning flight AI423 from Delhi to Ahmedabad earlier that morning
• Weather conditions: Clear blue skies over western India
• Crash location: Near a college hostel in Ahmedabad

Casualty Analysis

The incident resulted in one of India’s worst aviation disasters in recent history:

• Total souls on board: 242
• Confirmed fatalities: 241 passengers and crew members
• Survivors: 1 passenger (Vishwash Kumar, seated in 11A near emergency exit)
• Ground casualties: Potential additional casualties on the ground

Survivor Account

The sole survivor, Vishwash Kumar, reported to the Hindustan Times that approximately 30 seconds after takeoff, there was a loud noise followed by the crash. Kumar was seated in 11A, next to an emergency exit, which likely contributed to his survival.

Aircraft Technical Details

Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner Specifications:

• Registration: VT-ANB
• Delivery date: February 2014
• Fleet position: Part of Air India’s 27 Boeing 787-8 Dreamliners
• Previous flight: AI423 Delhi to Ahmedabad (morning of incident)

Fuel Load Impact: According to emergency responders, the aircraft carried approximately 125,000 liters of fuel. The high fuel load combined with elevated temperatures significantly complicated rescue efforts, with officials stating there was minimal chance of survival due to the intense fire.

Expert Analysis and Technical Assessment

Aviation expert Jeff Guzzetti, former NTSB investigator, observed that “the airplane is unable to climb” based on initial reports. This assessment suggests potential issues with:

• Engine performance or failure
• Weight and balance problems
• Control system malfunctions
• Aerodynamic factors affecting climb performance

Flight Profile Analysis

Based on available information:

• Takeoff time: 13:38 hours local time
• Incident timing: Approximately 30 seconds after takeoff
• Flight behavior: Struggling to gain altitude over western India
• Crash sequence: Rapid descent into college hostel area

Boeing 787 Safety Context

This incident adds to ongoing scrutiny of Boeing aircraft safety. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner, while generally considered a safe aircraft, has faced various technical challenges throughout its operational history. The crash adds to woes at the troubled U.S. planemaker, highlighting continued concerns about Boeing’s quality control and safety protocols.

Response and Compensation

Immediate Response:

• Emergency services deployed to crash site
• Search operations for additional survivors
• Investigation teams mobilized

Corporate Response:

• Tata Sons (Air India’s parent company) announced ₹1 crore ex-gratia compensation for victims’ families
• Boeing released statement acknowledging awareness of initial reports and gathering information

Investigation Priorities

Key areas requiring immediate investigation:

1. Engine performance data – Analysis of both engine parameters during takeoff phase
2. Weight and loading – Verification of aircraft weight distribution and fuel load
3. Maintenance records – Review of recent maintenance activities on VT-ANB
4. Weather conditions – Assessment of atmospheric conditions affecting performance
5. Crew procedures – Evaluation of crew actions during the emergency

Potential Contributing Factors (Under Investigation)

While the investigation is ongoing, preliminary considerations include:

• Technical malfunction – Possible engine or system failure
• Environmental factors – High ambient temperatures affecting performance
• Operational factors – Loading, fuel distribution, or procedural issues
• Aircraft condition – Maintenance status of the 11-year-old aircraft

Critical Testimony from Ex-Air India Crew Member

Explosive Revelations About Aircraft History

A former Air India crew member, @VivekPatel-sh4cw, provided damning testimony about the crashed aircraft, revealing systemic issues that had been documented for years:

Key Allegations from Ex-Crew Member:

Long-Standing Aircraft Problems:

• “This aircraft has had issues for YEARS. Literally years.”
• “The crew, pilots, engineers, literally everyone has always mentioned about it in the log book.”
• The problems were well-documented and known across all operational staff

Corporate Negligence Claims:

• Air India allegedly lacked a spare Dreamliner for their “most precious Gatwick sector”
• Crew were “always made to fly this aircraft” despite known issues
• The company prioritized route operations over aircraft safety concerns

Personal Experience with Same Aircraft:

• The ex-crew member personally experienced an engine failure on this specific aircraft
• Their incident involved taking off and immediately landing back “without being in air for even 30 mins”
• They “landed back safely” in what was described as “a similar case”

Corporate Cover-Up Allegations:

• “Here, no staff but solely the company is at fault”
• “But the company won’t let any staff talk about it on a public channel”
• “They’d rather blame the staff and not take accountability”

Systemic Safety Concerns Revealed

This testimony exposes several critical issues:

1. Known Defects: The aircraft had documented problems spanning years
2. Operational Pressure: Crews were forced to operate problematic aircraft due to fleet limitations
3. Maintenance Logging: Issues were properly documented in logbooks but ignored
4. Corporate Silence: Staff were allegedly prevented from speaking publicly about safety concerns
5. Previous Incidents: The aircraft had experienced at least one previous engine failure

Implications for Investigation

These revelations suggest:

• Preventable Disaster: The crash could have been avoided if documented concerns were addressed
• Corporate Liability: Air India may face serious negligence charges
• Regulatory Failure: Aviation authorities may have failed in oversight duties
• Whistleblower Protection: Industry needs better protection for staff reporting safety issues

Conclusion

The Air India Flight AI171 crash represents a tragic loss of life that, according to insider testimony, was entirely preventable. The explosive revelations from ex-Air India crew member @VivekPatel-sh4cw paint a disturbing picture of corporate negligence, where documented safety concerns were ignored for years in favor of operational convenience.

Key Takeaways:

• This was not an unexpected technical failure but a disaster with a documented history
• The aircraft had known problems spanning years, logged by multiple crew members
• Air India allegedly prioritized schedule maintenance over passenger safety
• Corporate culture of silence prevented staff from raising public safety concerns
• Previous incidents with the same aircraft should have triggered immediate grounding

The survival of one passenger demonstrates both the severity of the incident and raises questions about why 241 people had to die when the problems were known and documented. This case highlights the critical need for:

1. Mandatory aircraft grounding when persistent problems are documented
2. Whistleblower protection for aviation staff reporting safety concerns
3. Independent oversight of airline maintenance decisions
4. Corporate accountability when profit is prioritized over passenger safety
5. Transparent investigation that addresses systemic failures, not just technical causes

The testimony suggests this tragedy could have been prevented if Air India had acted on documented safety concerns instead of forcing crews to operate a problematic aircraft. The investigation must examine not just what happened, but why known problems were allowed to persist until they became fatal.

This report is based on initial reports and will be updated as official investigation findings become available.