UEFA is set to request a review of the double touch rule on penalty kicks following a controversial decision that impacted Atlético Madrid in their Champions League last-16 clash against Real Madrid.
Julián Alvarez’s penalty was overturned after video assistant referee (VAR) intervention, citing an unintentional double contact, which ultimately played a role in Atlético’s defeat. UEFA has now expressed its intention to engage in discussions with FIFA and the International Football Association Board (IFAB) to reconsider the regulation.
The Alvarez Incident: A Costly Technicality
During the decisive penalty shootout on Wednesday, Alvarez stepped up to take a crucial kick against Real Madrid’s Thibaut Courtois. In an unfortunate turn of events, he unintentionally made contact with the ball using both his right and left foot before it crossed the goal line. Despite the apparent lack of intent, VAR ruled the goal out based on existing laws, handing Real Madrid a crucial advantage that helped them secure a spot in the quarter-finals.
Atlético Madrid sought clarification from UEFA on why the goal was disallowed. In response, UEFA explained that under the current rule, even minimal additional contact with the ball before another player touches it constitutes an offence.
The Laws Governing Penalty Kicks
As per IFAB’s regulations, if a player taking a penalty makes the ball move and then touches it again before it reaches another player, the attempt is considered a miss. This rule applies to both regulation time penalties and shootouts. The disallowed goal was a marginal call, but it was in line with existing protocols.
UEFA released an official statement addressing the situation:
“Atlético de Madrid enquired with UEFA over the incident, which led to the disallowance of the kick from the penalty mark taken by Julián Alvarez at the end of yesterday’s UEFA Champions League match against Real Madrid.”
“Although minimal, the player made contact with the ball using his standing foot before kicking it, as shown in the attached video clip. Under the current rule, the VAR had to call the referee signalling that the goal should be disallowed.“
UEFA’s Call for Review
While UEFA acknowledged that VAR followed the letter of the law, the governing body believes that cases of clearly unintentional double touches warrant further examination. The organization has now initiated discussions with FIFA and IFAB to assess whether changes to the rule should be considered.
“UEFA will enter discussions with FIFA and IFAB to determine whether the rule should be reviewed in cases where a double touch is clearly unintentional.”
This move highlights UEFA’s intent to refine the sport’s rules to avoid similar incidents in the future, particularly in high-stakes matches.
Atlético Madrid’s European Struggles Continue
For Atlético Madrid, this latest defeat against their city rivals extended a frustrating pattern in European competitions. This marked their sixth consecutive loss to Real Madrid on the continental stage, adding to the club’s history of near misses against their local adversaries.
Meanwhile, Real Madrid continues their dominance in the Champions League, advancing to their 12th quarter-final in 15 seasons. They will now prepare to face Arsenal in a two-legged tie, with the first match set to take place at the Emirates Stadium on April 8, followed by the return fixture on April 16.
The Alvarez incident has reignited discussions about the rigidity of football’s rulebook and the role of intent in officiating decisions. UEFA’s decision to push for a review signals a possible shift toward greater fairness in penalty rulings. If changes are made, future players may not be penalized for accidental infractions, ensuring that such marginal moments do not unfairly influence the outcome of crucial matches.
Read More: Rodrygo Is An Underrated Superstar: His UCL Legacy Proves He’s Elite In His Own Right
