Former BCCI president Sourav Ganguly has made a startling revelation about pitch preparation protocols, disclosing that board-appointed curators assume control of wickets just four days before Test matches. This admission comes amid intense scrutiny over pitch conditions and their impact on the quality of Test cricket in India.
Table of Contents
Pitch Preparation Controversy: Key Facts
| Detail | Information |
|---|---|
| Revealed By | Sourav Ganguly |
| Takeover Timeline | 4 days before Test match |
| Authority | BCCI-appointed curators |
| Controversy Location | Kolkata pitch |
| Issue | Pitch preparation standards |
| Governing Body | Board of Control for Cricket in India |
Sourav Ganguly’s Explosive Revelation
The Prince of Kolkata’s disclosure has opened a Pandora’s box regarding pitch preparation transparency in Indian cricket. According to Ganguly, venue curators lose control of their own surfaces when BCCI specialists arrive merely days before crucial Test matches commence.
This practice raises questions about accountability, consistency, and whether local ground staff receive adequate support or interference during critical preparation phases. The timing particularly matters when pitches behave unexpectedly, leading to debates about home advantage versus fair playing conditions.

The Kolkata Pitch Row Explained
Eden Gardens, Ganguly’s home ground, found itself at the center of this controversy following concerns about pitch behavior during recent matches. Critics argue that late intervention disrupts established preparation processes, while supporters claim BCCI oversight ensures national standards and prevents extreme conditions favoring home teams unfairly.
The debate intensifies when international fixtures are involved, with touring nations occasionally expressing concerns about playing surface conditions. The International Cricket Council (ICC) monitors pitch quality through official ratings, making preparation protocols crucial for India’s hosting reputation.
What This Means for Indian Cricket
Ganguly’s candid admission highlights the complex relationship between local ground authorities and national cricket administration. While centralized oversight might ensure consistency, it potentially undermines experienced local curators who understand their venues intimately.
The four-day takeover window leaves minimal room for adjustments if conditions change unexpectedly. Weather factors, moisture levels, and grass coverage require constant monitoring and expertise that develops through years of working specific grounds.
The Bigger Picture
This controversy extends beyond Kolkata, affecting pitch preparation nationwide. Transparency in these processes becomes essential for maintaining cricket’s integrity and ensuring competitive Test match conditions.
As debates continue about ideal pitch conditions balancing bat and ball, Ganguly’s revelation demands deeper examination of preparation protocols. The cricket community now questions whether current systems serve the game’s best interests or require significant reform.
Read more cricket news and controversies on TechnoSports.







