30.6 C
Delhi

AMD’s Radeon RX 6400 losses its Performance by 14% Performance due to PCIe 3.0

TechPowerUp recently tested AMD’s new Radeon RX 6400 GPU on the slower PCIe 3.0 interface to see if there were any significant performance losses compared to PCIe 4.0 and discovered that this was the case due to the GPU’s unusual layout of only four PCIe lanes. Depending on the resolution, performance dropped by up to 14 percent on average.

AMD’s Radeon RX 6400 is a new entry-level GPU for the desktop market that uses AMD’s ultra-compact Navi 24 chip, which was originally designed for laptops. To save money, this GPU, like its bigger sibling, the Radeon RX 6500 XT, only has four PCIe 4.0 lanes.

In comparison to the Radeon RX 6500 XT, the Radeon RX 6400 has a 13 percent lower core count and memory bandwidth. Due to a drop in GDDR6 speeds to 16 Gbps, the graphics card only has 768 cores and 128 Gbps of memory capacity. However, the memory capacity remains at 4GB. The biggest advantage of the Radeon RX 6400 is its low power consumption.

Radeon RX 6400
credit: AMD

When compared to PCIe 4.0, the Radeon RX 6400 running on PCIe 3.0 experienced a 14 percent drop in performance at both 1080P and 1440P in the 24 games TechPowerUp evaluated

The 4K results were considerably worse, with a performance disadvantage of 23%. However, considering the Radeon RX 6400 offers unplayable FPS on both PCIe generations, we suspect it will matter much.

- Advertisement -TechnoSports-Ad

F1 2021 and Doom Eternal were among the worst offenders, with performance differences of 79 percent and 43 percent at 1080P, respectively. Fortunately, almost all of the other games tested were in the 14 percent range or lower, but these two games, in particular, demonstrate how PCIe bandwidth-intensive some gaming engines can be.

TechPowerUp’s testing of the Radeon RX 6500 XT yielded roughly identical findings, with a 13 percent performance difference between PCIe 3.0 and PCIe 4.0. Even if the GPU is slower, the Radeon RX 6400 can’t get beyond Navi 24’s four-lane constraints.

The PCIe 3.0 interface of the Radeon RX 6400 was about 20% slower than the GeForce GTX 1650, which uses the identical PCIe 3.0 interface but has a much healthier x16 lane design. The Radeon RX 6400, however, performed comparably to the GeForce GTX 1650 when put on a PCIe 4.0 interface.

- Advertisement -TechnoSports-Ad

Also Read: AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, RX 6750 XT, RX 6650 XT Final Specifications have finally been Confirmed

source

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Nivedita Bangari
Nivedita Bangari
I am a software engineer by profession and technology is my love, learning and playing with new technologies is my passion.
TechnoSports-Ad

Popular

TechnoSports-Ad

Related Stories

More from author

The list of Airtel SMS packs as of April 19, 2024

Check out the list of Airtel SMS packs, including costs and validity information. We have shared a list of Airtel SMS recharge plans that...

My Jio Recharge Plans as of April 19, 2024: Top trending plans from Jio

My Jio Recharge Plans: Since its establishment in 2016, Reliance Jio has made a remarkable impact on the Indian te­lecommunications industry. The company has...

The Best Recharge Plan for Jio as of 19th April 2024

Best Recharge Plan for Jio in 2024: The Ultimate Guide In the past few months, Jio has introduced and tweaked a slew of new...

HBO Max in India: Here’s how you can watch the service using VPN (April 17)

HBO Max in India might launch soon but still, we cannot deny that we want to enjoy our favourite HBO shows as soon as...